About the book: World Literature for the Wretched of the Earth recovers a genealogy of anticolonial thought that advocates collective inexpertise, unknowing, and unrecognizability. Early twentieth-century anticolonial thinkers endeavored to imagine a world emancipated from colonial rule, but it was a world they knew they would likely not live to see. Written in exile, in abjection, or in the face of death, anticolonial thought could not afford to base its politics on the hope of eventual success, mastery, or national sovereignty. J. Daniel Elam shows how anticolonial thinkers theorized inconsequential practices of egalitarianism in the service of an impossibility: a world without colonialism.To trace this impossible political theory, Elam foregrounds theories of reading and critique in the writing of Lala Har Dayal, B. R. Ambedkar, M. K. Gandhi, and Bhagat Singh. These anticolonial activists theorized reading not as a way to cultivate mastery and expertise, but as a way rather to disavow mastery altogether. To become or remain an inexpert reader, divesting oneself of authorial claims, was to fundamentally challenge the logic of imperial rule, which prized self-mastery, authority, and sovereignty.Aligning Frantz Fanon’s political writing with Erich Auerbach’s philological project, Elam brings together the histories of comparative literature and anticolonial thought to demonstrate how these early twentieth-century theories of reading force us to reconsider the commitments of humanistic critique and egalitarian politics in the still-colonial present.
About the author: Dr. J. Daniel Elam is an assistant professor in Comparative Literature at the University of Hong Kong. In 2018-2019, he was a Fellow in the Society for the Humanities at Cornell University. He has previously taught at the University of Toronto and was the Mellon Sawyer Seminar Postdoctoral Fellow in ‘Bibliomigrancy’ at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.Daniel specialises in transnational Asian and African literatures in the twentieth century, modernism, postcolonial theory, and global intellectual history. He works on literature from the ‘global south’, with a focus on anticolonial movements in British Empire. He also works Black American anti-racist thought in the 1920s and 1930s, Third World solidarity movements during the Cold War, and anti-Apartheid activism in South Africa in the 1960s-1980s. He has written on Bhagat Singh, M.K. Gandhi, B.R. Ambedkar, W.E.B. Du Bois, Emma Goldman, and other figures. He has published essays in many journals, including Postcolonial Studies, Interventions, and PMLA. He is the co-editor, with Kama Maclean and Chris Moffat, of two volumes on South Asian revolutionary writing: Reading Revolutionaries (2014) and Writing Revolution (2017). His forthcoming monograph is Impossible and Necessary: Anticolonialism, Reading, Critique (Fordham University Press). At HKU, Daniel teaches courses in postcolonial theory, global modernism, and theories of comparativism. More information about his work can be found at www.jdelam.comRespondent:
Shruti Kapila, Faculty of History, University of Cambridge Shruti Kapila is University Lecturer in History at the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of Corpus Christi College. She is the editor of An Intellectual History for India and the coeditor of Political Thought in Action: The Bhagavad Gita and Modern India. Her writing has appeared in leading academic journals such as Past and Present and Modern Intellectual History and in international publications such as the Financial Times, India Today, and Prospect.
Moderator: Soo Ryon Yoon, Department of Cultural Studies, Lingnan University Soo Ryon Yoon is an assistant professor in cultural studies at Lingnan University, Hong Kong. Trained as a performance studies scholar, she teaches and writes about contemporary performance, dance history, and racial politics in South Korea. She is currently working on her first monograph, Choreographing Affinities: Blackness, Koreanness, and Performing Race in Korea on the circulation of African diasporic performances in the Korean context. Soo Ryon Yoon holds a PhD in Performance Studies from Northwestern University and was a CEAS postdoctoral associate at Yale University.
Date: 16 November, 2020 Time: 5 PM (GMT +8) Speaker: Nicholas Y. H. Wong, Postdoctoral Fellow in the Society of Fellows in the Humanities, The University of Hong Kong
New concepts of play and labor emerged in the wake of geopolitical East Asia’s capitalist restructuring after the Pacific War and specifically, the rise of Hong Kong’s plastic toy manufacturing. This dominant export-oriented colonial-national industry, I argue, shaped a generation of writers’s experience of childhood and subsequent attempts to write for and about the child. Modifying views of children in modern Chinese literature as national but also individual figures of development, I propose a Hong Kong theory of the child from the angle of mass production and consumption of cute, gimmicky objects, and ponder how literary writing both depicts and assumes the unstable relation between commodity and play-thing.
Date: 10 November 2020 Time: 5 PM (GMT +8) Speaker: Harry Yi-Jui Wu, Director and Assistant Professor at Medical Ethics and Humanities Unit, Lee Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong.
In the 19th Century, there was an increase of mental asylums in the British Empire. They reflected the positivist and bureaucratic mentality as the panacea to manage lunatics as social problems in the time of urbanization and industrialization. When studying the history of psychiatry in Britain’s colonies, scholars have written quite extensively about racial segregation and racial psychiatric theories derived along these practices. However, if one puts Hong Kong in the context of port governmentality and the economy of migration, mental health suggests something very different from what it means in other colonies. In the port city on the margin of the British and Chinese Empires, all aspects of migration were linked to the worldwide chain of business, and services were commoditized.Managing “lunatics” or “the insane” was a measure for Hong Kong to maintain its function as the doorway between the two empires. Many of these lunatics were suicidal coolies trying to jump off the Praya, or drunken sailors who were brought to the police station immediately upon arrival. Lacking rigorous research, governmental and medical officers tried to uphold the regular operation of the prospering trade port in the cross-cultural context. Small scale of confinement means asylums only functioned as temporary custodial facilities before “patients” of different nationalities were repatriated back to where they came from. In this presentation, I deem the early development of mental health in Hong Kong an arrangement settled along the networks of empires based on the marine nature of the port city. This new research on one hand re-examines the existing historiography of colonial medicine. On the other hand, it considers Hong Kong as a fluid concept and the use of Hong Kong as a process rather than a static entity.
About the Speaker: Harry Yi-Jui Wu is Director and Assistant Professor at Medical Ethics and Humanities Unit, Lee Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong. His book, Mad by the Millions: Mental Disorders and the Early Years of the World Health Organization will be published by MIT Press in April, 2021.Moderator: Laura Meek, Assistant Professor, Centre for the Humanities and Medicine, HKU
ABOUT THE BOOKS Antony Dapiran, City on Fire: The Fight for Hong Kong Through the long, hot summer of 2019, Hong Kong burned. Anti-government protests, sparked by a government proposal to introduce a controversial extradition law, grew into a pro-democracy movement that engulfed the city for months. Protesters fought street battles with police, and the unrest brought the People’s Liberation Army to the doorstep of Hong Kong. Driven primarily by youth protesters with their ‘Be water!’ philosophy, borrowed from hometown hero Bruce Lee, this leaderless, technology-driven protest movement defied a global superpower and changed Hong Kong, perhaps forever. In City on Fire, Antony Dapiran provides the first detailed analysis of the protests, and reveals the protesters’ unique tactics. He explains how the movement fits into the city’s long history of dissent, examines the cultural aspects of the movement, and looks at what the protests will mean for the future of Hong Kong, China, and China’s place in the world.
Pang Laikwan, The Appearing Demos: Hong Kong During and After the Umbrella Movement In the context of Hong Kong and its Occupy movement, this book deals with three sets of related questions. First, how can we understand the occupiers as autonomous and nonconformist but also as committed to a movement with meanings that reside mostly in its collective dimension? Second, what kinds of intersubjective relations were formed during the Occupy movement that helped individuals to construct their own political subjectivity? Third, can we learn from Hong Kong’s struggles and reconsider the city as a viable unit to formulate a political community? Together, these questions form a coherent attempt to explore participatory democracy not only in Hong Kong but also around the world.
Eunice Seng, Resistant Cities: Histories, Maps and the Architecture of Development This vivid book is an inquiry into the stagnation between the development of architectural practice and the progress in urban modernization. It is about islands as territories of resistance. It is about dense places where multitudes dwell in perennial contestations with the city on every front. It is about the histories, tactics and spaces of everyday survival within the hegemonic sway of global capital and unstoppable development. It is preoccupied with making visible the culture of resistance and architecture’s entanglement with it. It is about urban resilience. It is about Hong Kong, where uncertainty is status quo. This interdisciplinary volume explores real and invented places and identities that are created in tandem with Hong Kong’s urban development. Mapping contested spaces in the territory, it visualizes the energies and tenacity of the people as manifest in their daily life, social and professional networks and the urban spaces in which they inhabit. Embodying the multifaceted nature of the Asian metropolis, the book utilizes a combination of archival materials, public data sources, field observations and documentation, analytical drawings, models, and maps.
Gray Kochhar-Lindgren, Urban Arabesques: Philosophy, Hong Kong, Transversality (2020, Rowman & Littlefield International: New Critical Humanities Series) Urban Arabesques examines philosophy as an event of the city and the city as an event of philosophy and how the intertwining of the two generates an urban imaginary. This critique-in-motion of creative figures and conceptual personae from (non) philosophy illuminates the emergence of sense in the city, shows how “transcendental empiricism” operates within it, and how the everyday life of the streets–the ordinariness of experience as well as the screen/projector of urban surfaces–uncovers new pathways for politics, experience, and relationalities. Using Hong Kong as the primary site of thinking yet recognizing that thinking incessantly moves beyond any particular location, the book opens up cities within the city. Traversing Hong Kong reveals how the corners, the money, the trees and the water are involved in philosophy. Combining the linguistic approach found in Heidegger and Derrida, with the more materialist analysis of Serres and Deleuze, the objective of this book is to retheorize the urban and its imaginary–its virtuality, irreality, phantasmicity–with an emphasis on signs, images and rhythms, resonating through philosophy, and beyond.
ABOUT THE SPEAKERS Antony Dapiran is a Hong Kong-based writer and lawyer, and the author of the best-selling book City of Protest: A Recent History of Dissent in Hong Kong. His forthcoming book, City on Fire: The Fight for Hong Kong, will be published by Scribe in the new year. Antony has written and presented extensively on Hong Kong and Chinese politics, culture and business. His writing has appeared in The Atlantic, New Statesman, Foreign Policy, Quartz, Art Asia Pacific, Mekong Review and The Guardian, among many others. He is a regular guest on television and radio for the BBC and Australia’s ABC, and has provided comment and analysis to global media including The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Financial Times and beyond. A fluent Mandarin speaker, Antony has resided between Hong Kong and Beijing for over twenty years.
Pang Laikwan teaches Cultural Studies at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. She has published widely in the general field of modern and contemporary Chinese cultures. Her research interests include film studies, visual studies, creativity, aesthetics, as well as cultural and political theories. She has turned her attentions to socialist China in recent years. The Art of Cloning (2017) examines the contents and the logic of the propaganda culture of the Cultural Revolution, and it analyzes therelations between subject formation and social formation. Her latest book, The Appearing Demos (2020), discusses the recent dissident movements in Hong Kong in dialogue with Hannah Arendt’s political theories.
Eunice Seng is Associate Professor and Chair of the Departmental Research Postgraduate Committee in Architecture at the University of Hong Kong. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in Architectural Studies from the National University of Singapore, a Master of Architecture from Princeton University and a PhD from Columbia University. Her work explores various disciplinary intersections and questions of agency in architecture. Her research interests include the histories and theories of modernity and modernism; domesticity, housing and the metropolis; post-colonialism and politics of power; utopias, artefacts and their cultural representations.
Gray Kochhar-Lindgren is Professor & Director of the Common Core at the University of Hong Kong (https://commoncore.hku.hk/). A Fulbright Scholar and recipient of the UGC and HKU Outstanding Teaching Awards (Teams), he has also taught in Switzerland, Germany, and the United States. After initiating GLADE (Global Liberal Arts Design Experiments) in 2017, he is now co-designing, with students and colleagues, Critical Zones: Gender, Cities, and Well-Being and The Passion Project: Creating Work You Love. His most recent book is Urban Arabesques: Philosophy, Hong Kong, Transversality (2020, Rowman & Littlefield International) and he is currently working on Noir: Thought, Art, and Ecology; Pinxtos: Essays & Aphorisms; and a series of short fictions under the title After Magritte.
Moderator: Gina Marchetti, Professor, Department of Comparative Literature, HKU
Date: Monday, 21 Sept 2020 Time: 5 PM (GMT +8) Speaker: Katrien Jacobs, Associate Professor in Cultural Studies at the Chinese University of Hong Kong Moderator: Dr. Tim Gruenewald, Assistant Professor, American Studies, HKU
Pepe the Frog as a mascot of the global alt-right and male supremacist hate wars has been liberated by the Hong Kong anti-extradition protest movement and its pro-democracy ideology. What are some of the reasons that this mascot figure has crossed political frontlines and what does it now mean to liberate Hong Kong? In this talk I will explain how USA and EU far-right netizens and activists have made great efforts to hijack and rebrand online imagery and personas within a Gramscian quest for cultural hegemony. I also critically ponder if the re-hijacked mascot personifies collectivism or elitism, inclusivity or xenophobia, gender freedom or machismo within the Hong Kong protest culture.
About the speaker: Katrien Jacobs is Associate Professor in Cultural Studies at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and the Program Director of the MA in Visual Culture Studies. She has lectured and published widely about sexuality and gender in and around digital media, contemporary arts and media activism. She moved to Hong Kong in 2005 and devotes most of her research to contemporary Chinese, Japanese and trans-Asian arts and digital media platforms. She has authored three books about Internet culture and sexuality and her work can be found at www.katrienjacobs.com
Department of Comparative Literature, Faculty of Arts and the University Museum and Art Gallery at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) jointly present — “Eileen Chang at the University of Hong Kong: An online presentation of images and documents from the archives” on the occasion of the centennial celebration of Chang’s birth in 2020.
An exhaustive chronicle of the protests that gave rise to the Umbrella Movement as a rejection of lack of freedom imposed by China to Hong-Kong, with interviews to the main leaders of activist groups, and the authoritative response from the Chinese government.
Evans Yiu Shing Chan is a New York- and Hong Kong-based critic, librettist and an independent filmmaker of more than a dozen fiction and documentary films, which have been screened around the world. His directorial debut To Liv(e) (1991) was listed by Time Out as one of the 100 Greatest Hong Kong Films. A critical anthology about his work, Postcolonalism, Diaspora, and Alternative Histories: The Cinema of Evans Chan was published by the HKU Press in 2015. We Have Boots is the sequel to his acclaimed documentary Raise the Umbrellas (2016). Click here for more on the works of CSGC Virtual Guest Artist, Evans Chan.
Hong Kong on the Edge: Actors and Observers Part 1
Professor ho-fung Hung (Co-Moderator), Benny Tai, Alex Chow, Evans Chan, Tom Vick (Co-Moderator)
Hong Kong on the Edge: Actors and Observers Part 2
emily lau, Michael C. Davis, Antony Dapiran, Gina Marchetti, Evans Chan
To read Gina Marchetti’s essay “Sexual citizenship and social justice in the HKSAR: Evans Chan’s Raise the Umbrellas (2016)” click here.
“Rogue Cops – Return the eye!” [Free access to uncensored version through July 6 at end of review.]
“We Have Boots” is a fiery documentary interspersed with moments d’art. Echoing throughout the film is the rich full voice of Marion Anderson singing (1924), “Go down Moses/Way down in Egypt land/Tell all pharaohs to/Let my people go!” The refrain, “Let my people go,” repeats amidst interludes of dance, music, artistic representation, and drama, reflecting the issues Hong Kong students passionately use to convince China and the world to support their freedom. Ultimately, they want self-determination for Hong Kong and they are willing to give up their lives for it.
In a world already gone mad, Hong Kong’s insurgency movement, specifically beginning in 2014 and accelerating through 2017-19, is a reflection of people’s movements around the world, beginning with the Arab Spring and American Occupy protests.
In 2019, NPR (National Public Radio) referred to the 2010s as “A Decade Of Protests Around The World.” Now, in 2020, spurring worldwide response, is Black Lives Matter. People are rising up, especially against police brutality and injustice in a demand for true democracy.
“We Have Boots” documents the Hong Kong uprising against China’s gradual but determined reclamation. When a crowd of people in the Yoho Mall were attacked by police seemingly gone wild, one policeman shot a woman at close range with a rubber bullet to her eye. Like George Floyd’s killing, this act was caught on camera. Blood gushes out and a movement rises in even greater outrage.
The problem is that Hongkongers were brought up in the British system and schooled with antipathy towards the Chinese governmental system and culture. Since 1843 when the Hong Kong area was bequeathed to Britain as a leased colony and spoil of a trade war, the area has had a double identity. Once the lease expired in 1997, China insisted on its return to the mainland. Britain agreed after Chinese assurances that Hong Kong’s systems, freedoms, and way of life would be retained.
However, after the return was actualized, and the Hongkongers reasonably expected universal suffrage with free elections, Chinese immigrants moved in and the Chinese government insisted on vetting candidates so that only those following the Communist hard line were allowed on the ballot.
Hongkongers, especially students, wanted their own representation, freedom, and values. An incensed culture clash ensued, with young students, 16-24, willing to sacrifice their lives for the cause.
The chant about rogue cops is analogous to their loss of freedom, their oppression, and their surprise. A student tries to tell a policeman that they come from the same place. Why is he fighting against his own people? The call to return the eye, though based in a true attack caught on camera, is also a call to return Hong Kong to its people. They grew up with Western values, an incredibly healthy economy, and a preparation for democratic self-rule.
These students are some of the best-educated, most literate, most intelligent people in the world. They are outraged by what they view as a totalitarian society sucking them into a mass automaton state. It’s a clash between collectivism vs. individualism. The students are fighting for their very identities, their spirits, and the democratic futures that they were educated to fulfill.
The film’s title, “We Have Boots,” was inspired by a poem written by Nikki Giovanni, an African-America poet: “We begin a poem / with longing / and end with / responsibility / And laugh / all through the storms / that are bound / to come / We have umbrellas / We have boots / We have each / other.”
In 2020, the year of BLM, we now know the reason for the umbrellas – to protect the protestors from the tear gas and pepper spray used by the police to debilitate them. The boots are for walking for as long as it takes.
Uncertain times call for creative solutions and, like many film festivals, Sheffield Doc/Fest would rather compromise than sacrifice, offering film-goers an alternate way to see incredible new documentaries after confirming a physical edition would not go ahead due to the current pandemic. Over the past month, the festival launched an online platform called Selects, on which UK audiences were able to digitally see new documentaries via a great pay-per-view model. Furthermore, the festival won’t be discounting theatrical screenings altogether, intending to continue in Autumn with a series of weekend screenings in Sheffield.
Whilst I greatly missed the city, the people, and the Showroom Cinema, I was appreciative of Doc/Fest’s determination to go ahead in this new form. Over three columns, I will be reviewing the highlights of my viewing experience on Doc/Fest Selects. To begin with, here are my reviews of We Have Boots, Flint, and Me and the Cult Leader.
WE HAVE BOOTS (EVANS CHAN)
Hong Kong Second Wave auteur Evans Chan brings an essayist touch to his new documentary film We Have Boots. Creatively constructed and highly informative, this is a cinematic anthem for Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement.
The film opens by juxtaposing a nationalist Chinese passage of words – criticising HK’s education, the US’s history of colonialism and slavery, how the rise of China has “blazed a new trail for mankind – before cutting to the reality of the 2019-20 protests where we witness police brutality and misconduct attempting to suppress the thousands who took to the streets to protest against the Fugitive Offenders Amendment Bill, which would have potentially seen China exploit its power over dissident voices in neighbouring countries.
Before these recent protests, though, the Umbrella Movement happened in 2014, serving as a catalyst for the events of five years later. We Have Boots thoroughly recaps the revolution, collating the perspectives of activists, academics, and other intellectuals in Hong Kong who provide historical and cultural context. Former Hong Kong student union leader and current Berkeley student Alex Chow is a key talking head, speaking of his unique experience in jail wherein he learned of the reality for the underprivileged people in the region.
Likewise, social activist Agnes Chow has an interesting origin story, talking about how Scholarism – the leading organisation during the Umbrella Movement – was founded after she went viral for calling for transparency regarding the missing booksellers of Causeway Bay in late 2015. “People are powerless only wielding the meagre power of voting”, she says, succinctly endorsing the power of protest that many Hong Kongers have believed in over the last ten years of controversial government ruling.
As secure of a learning experience, it is to view talking heads and archive footage of demonstrations, it’s the cinematic flair that makes We Have Boots so enthralling. As aforementioned, the opening sequence is a brilliant example. There’s also a staggering drone shot over thousands of protestors that are augmented by picture-in-picture dissolves of the possible changemakers on both sides, including former legislator Margaret Ng and Hong Kong’s Chief Executive Carrie Lam.
We Have Boots is a great piece of journalism that could only have improved if there was access to the alternate perspective. All the academics and activists interviewed are on the side of the Umbrella Movement. However, when it’s clear that mainland China can control the narrative, thus resulting in such widespread protests, the inclusion of pro-government POV’s becomes less appealing.
Date: Thursday 25 June 2020 Time: 10 AM (GMT +8) Speaker: Daniel Elam, Assistant Professor, Department of Comparative Literature, Hong Kong
Karen Cheung and Daniel Elam will discuss their reflections on the ongoing Hong Kong protests, both on the ground as well as part of a long tradition of anticolonial activism.
About the Speakers J Daniel Elam is an assistant professor in the Department of Comparative Literature at the University of Hong Kong. His book, World Literature for the Wretched of the Earth, will be out later this year.
Karen Cheung is a writer, journalist, and editor in Hong Kong. She has written for New Statesman, Foreign Policy, the New York Times, and other publications. She’s currently working on a nonfiction book about Hong Kong.
Date: Monday, 22 June 2020 Time: 8 PM HK Time (GMT +8) Speakers: Patricia Zimmermann, Mercedes Vazquez, Ria Sinha
This panel addresses the impact of the current COVID-19 crisis on arts and humanities research with specific emphasis on the challenges facing women and minorities in academic life. Initial research, for example, shows a precipitous drop in journal submissions from women since the lockdown. The crisis also adds fuel to debates surrounding the relevance of the arts and humanities in the twenty-first century. Our panelists cover a range of disciplines and geographic regions to provide a multidimensional conversation and widen our perspective on gender, diversity, and democracy during the pandemic.
SPEAKER AND MODERATOR BIOS Ria Sinha Ria Sinha trained as an infectious disease scientist at Imperial College London and Universiteit Leiden, the Netherlands, and is currently senior research fellow in the Centre for the Humanities and Medicine at the University of Hong Kong. Her interdisciplinary research considers the complex and dynamic sociocultural, ecological, technological, and scientific determinants of infectious disease emergence and management.
Mercedes Vazquez Mercedes Vázquez is a Lecturer and Honorary Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Arts of The University of Hong Kong where she leads the research subcommittee of the Committee on Gender, Equality and Diversity. Her most important recent publications include a monograph on contemporary cinematic representations of class in the cinemas of Latin America—The Question of Class in Contemporary Latin American Cinema (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2018)—, a book chapter comparing diverse figurations of precariousness in Venezuelan cinema, and the Oxford Bibliography on Latin American Cinema (OUP). At HKU, she teaches undergraduate research skills applied to the study of Latin American and European cinemas, Spanish language and Hispanic Cultures, with a focus on gender and sexuality. She has shared her teaching approaches in journals such as Cinegogía and Tinta China, and is currently preparing a webminar comparing pedagogies during COVID in Hong Kong and Mainland China and conducting research on women filmmakers and Latsploitation cinema.
Patricia Zimmermann Patricia R. Zimmermann is Professor of Screen Studies in the Roy H. Park School School of Communications and codirector of the Finger Lakes Environment Film Festival at Ithaca College, Ithaca, New York. Her most recent book is Documentary Across Platforms: Reverse Engineering Media, Place, and Politics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2019). She is the author of Open Space Collaborative New Media: A Toolkit for Theory and Practice, with Helen De Michiel (London and New York: Routledge Press, 2018); The Flaherty: Fifty Years in the Cause of Independent Cinema, with Scott MacDonald (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2017); Open Spaces: Openings, Closings, and Thresholds in International Public Media (St. Andrews, Scotland: University of St. Andrews Press, 2016); Thinking through Digital Media: Transnational Environments and Locative Places with Dale Hudson (New York and London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2015); States of Emergency: Documentaries, Wars, Democracies (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000); and Reel Families: A Social History of Amateur Film (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995). She is coeditor with Karen Ishizuka of Mining the Home Movie: Excavations into Historical and Cultural Memories (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007). Her new book, Flash Flaherty: Tales from a Film Seminar, with Scott MacDonald, will be published in early 2021 by Indiana University Press.
Moderator: Gina Marchetti Gina Marchetti teaches courses in film, gender and sexuality, critical theory and cultural studies at the University of Hong Kong. She is the author of Romance and the “Yellow Peril”: Race, Sex and Discursive Strategies in Hollywood Fiction (Berkeley: University of California, 1993), From Tian’anmen to Times Square: Transnational China and the Chinese Diaspora on Global Screens (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2006), and The Chinese Diaspora on American Screens: Race, Sex, and Cinema (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2012), Andrew Lau and Alan Mak’s INFERNAL AFFAIRS—The Trilogy (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2007), and Citing China: Politics, Postmodernism, and World Cinema (Hawai’i, 2018), among other publications.
